Independent public reference library

Ageing biology, biomarkers, interventions, and research literacy.

Chronic Inflammation and Inflammaging

Key Takeaways

Inflammation coordinates defence, containment, repair, and adaptation. Acute inflammation is usually time-limited and organized around a defined challenge. Inflammaging refers instead to a chronic inflammatory tendency that can emerge from many weak or recurring inputs across the body. The expanded hallmarks framework treats chronic inflammation as a hallmark because it both reflects and influences other ageing mechanisms. [1] [4]

Acute Inflammation and Inflammaging

FeatureAcute ResponseInflammaging
Typical triggerInfection, injury, or short-lived challengeMultiple endogenous, environmental, and persistent inputs
Time courseRapid activation followed by resolutionLong-term, fluctuating, and often low-grade
Main valueDefence and repairNo single adaptive purpose; may reflect accumulated dysregulation
MeasurementClinical context plus local and systemic markersRepeated patterns across markers, tissues, and health context

Where the Signals Can Come From

These contributors can reinforce one another, which makes inflammaging a network property rather than a single cytokine pathway. [1] [2] [3]

Relationship to Immunosenescence

Immunosenescence describes age-associated changes in immune composition and function, including altered responses to new antigens and changes in surveillance. Inflammaging describes persistent inflammatory activity. The two overlap and can reinforce each other, but reduced immune responsiveness and excessive inflammatory signalling are not the same phenomenon. [3]

Human Variation Matters

Inflammatory trajectories vary with infection history, environment, body composition, chronic disease, medication, ancestry, and social conditions. Older age does not produce one universal cytokine profile. Cross-sectional differences can also reflect disease burden rather than ageing itself, so longitudinal and population-diverse research is important. [2] [5]

Evidence Quality and Interpretation

Observational evidence consistently links several inflammatory markers with morbidity, frailty, and mortality risk, while mechanistic research identifies plausible feedback loops with other hallmarks. However, association does not show that one marker is causal or that suppressing it will improve every outcome. Anti-inflammatory interventions can also impair host defence or tissue repair, making pathway, timing, and population essential to interpretation. [2] [3]

What This Does Not Mean

Related Reading

Educational Disclaimer

This content is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.

References

  1. López-Otín, C. et al. “Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe.” Cell (2023). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10809922/
  2. Furman, D. et al. “Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span.” Nature Medicine (2019). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-019-0675-0
  3. Ferrucci, L. & Fabbri, E. “Inflammageing: chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty.” Nature Reviews Cardiology (2018). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-018-0064-2
  4. Franceschi, C. et al. “Inflammaging: a new immune–metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases.” Nature Reviews Endocrinology (2018). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41574-018-0059-4
  5. Terekhova, M. & Artyomov, M. “Rethinking inflammaging across human diversity.” Nature Aging (2025). https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-025-00933-y